Worldwide: +61 3 9584 6966 Tollfree USA: 1-800-345-1632 Mastel INC Freecall within the USA: 1-800-657-8057 Cart Log in

Clinical outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis using combined topography and refractive wavefront treatments for myopic astigmatism

Primary tabs

Noel Alpins, FRANZCO, FRCOphth, FACS, George Stamatelatos, BScOptom

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) guided by wavefront alone versus wavefront plus topographic data.
SETTING: NewVision Clinics, Cheltenham, Australia.
METHODS: Twenty-one eyes (14 patients) were distributed into 2 groups in a prospective doublemasked study. One group was treated by wavefront parameters alone (WF, n Z 11), and the other, by wavefront combined with topography values (WF&VP, n Z 10) using vector planning. All treatments were performed using Visx Star S4 CustomVue software. In the WF&VP group, the treatment profile was calculated using simulated keratometry readings from the Humphrey Atlas topography and 2nd-order Zernike coefficients defocus 4 and astigmatism 3 and 5 from the WaveScan wavefront display of the entire eye.
RESULTS: Mean corneal astigmatism preoperatively was 1.07 diopters (D) G 0.54 (SD) in the WF group and 1.50 G 0.87 D in the WF&VP group. At 6 months, it was 0.67 G 0.57 D (39% reduction) and 0.83 G 0.55 D (44% reduction), respectively. The WF&VP group had a greater reduction in horizontal coma. The mean gain in low-contrast visual acuity under mesopic conditions was 0.06 in the WF group and 0.11 in the WF&VP group and the mean gain in high-contrast visual acuity, 0.02 and 0.05, respectively. Two patients reported a change in the preferred eye postoperatively to the eye treated using vector planning. No result demonstrated statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: The WF&VP group had greater reduction in corneal astigmatism and better visual outcomes under mesopic conditions than the WF group and equivalent higher-order aberrations.
J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34:1250–1259 Q 2008 ASCRS and ESCRS